Mitigating evidence

Results: 37



#Item
11Knowledge / Education / Extenuating circumstances / Thesis / Evidence / Attendant circumstance / Jury / Criminal law / Law / Legal terms

Mitigating Circumstances Policy, Procedure and Guidance Introduction 1. This policy outlines the normal College procedures relating to applications for consideration of mitigating circumstances. Mitigating Circumstances

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.bbk.ac.uk

Language: English - Date: 2015-01-23 04:33:59
12Evidence law / Mitigating evidence / Jury / Appeal / Armstead / Plea bargain / Mitigating factor / Law / Criminal law / Legal procedure

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.in.gov

Language: English - Date: 2015-01-21 06:34:55
13Mitigating evidence / Plea bargain / Extenuating circumstances / Murder in English law / Strickland v. Washington / Criminal law / Law / Mitigating factor

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.in.gov

Language: English - Date: 2015-01-22 09:59:30
14English criminal law / Murder in English law / Extenuating circumstances / Jury / Mitigating evidence / Attendant circumstance / Murder / Mitigating factor / Gregg v. Georgia / Law / Criminal law / Legal terms

Penalty Proceedings – Capital Cases I. INSTRUCTION BEFORE PENALTY PHASE BEGINS A. 1. [To be given at the beginning of the penalty proceeding before a jury that did not try the issue of guilt.] Ladies and gentlemen of t

Add to Reading List

Source URL: judicial.alabama.gov

Language: English - Date: 2015-01-09 11:03:59
15Mitigating factor / Walton v. Arizona / Gregg v. Georgia / Ring v. Arizona / Jury / Mitigating evidence / Murder in English law / United States Supreme Court cases involving mental health / Strickland v. Washington / Law / Case law / Criminal law

II. Capital Punishment in Arizona History In Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S[removed]), the United States Supreme Court held that the death penalty as administered violated the United States Constitution Eighth Amendment pr

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.azag.gov

Language: English - Date: 2014-10-24 18:56:17
16Juries / Legal procedure / Attendant circumstance / Extenuating circumstances / Murder in English law / Mitigating evidence / Means /  motive /  and opportunity / Mitigating factor / Gregg v. Georgia / Law / Criminal law / Legal terms

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA November 9, 2007 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that Alabama Pattern Jury Instructions – Criminal for the penalty phase of capital proceedings be

Add to Reading List

Source URL: ali.state.al.us

Language: English - Date: 2014-09-11 12:21:34
17Plea / Mitigating evidence / Law / Criminal law / Mitigating factor

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.in.gov

Language: English - Date: 2014-10-27 10:05:47
18Juries / Ring v. Arizona / Gregg v. Georgia / Spaziano v. Florida / Mitigating factor / Walton v. Arizona / Apprendi v. New Jersey / Murder in English law / Mitigating evidence / Law / Case law / Criminal law

[removed]Woodward v. Alabama[removed])

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

Language: English - Date: 2013-11-18 09:59:53
19Mitigating factor / Evidence / Jury / Wiggins v. Smith / Motion / Law / Strickland v. Washington / Government

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No[removed]___________________________ Wesley Ira Purkey

Add to Reading List

Source URL: media.ca8.uscourts.gov

Language: English - Date: 2013-09-06 11:00:05
20Appellate review / Lawsuits / Mitigating factor / Mitigating evidence / Jury / Law / Legal procedure / Appeal

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.in.gov

Language: English - Date: 2014-08-15 10:14:06
UPDATE